Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Clinical breast examination and breast self-examination experience in a family practice population.

Authors: K, Keller; E, George; R N, Podell;

Clinical breast examination and breast self-examination experience in a family practice population.

Abstract

A patient questionnaire, chart audit, and resident questionnaire were used to assess clinical breast examination and breast self-examination experience in a family practice patient population. It was found that approximately 50 percent of the women studied reported annual routine breast examinations during a five-year study period. However, the residency program was responsible for providing or documenting annual clinical examinations in only ten percent of the population. Although 99 percent of the women knew about Breast Self-Examination (BSE), only 19 percent practiced monthly BSE. A positive association was found between the physician's active teaching of BSE and the patient's confidence in and regular practice of BSE. The low number of annual clinical examinations and low performance of BSE may be explained partially by the physician's setting too narrowly the parameters of when a clinical breast examination and BSE teaching could be done appropriately, ie, a pap smear/pelvic or general examination. A more aggressive approach by the physician may increase the number of women who get routine clinical breast examinations and who supplement them by monthly BSE.

Keywords

Adult, Medical Audit, Palpation, Internship and Residency, Breast Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Female, Breast, Family Practice, Physical Examination, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!