Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Modified procarbazine, CCNU, and vincristine (PCV 3) combination chemotherapy in the treatment of malignant brain tumors.

Authors: V A, Levin; M S, Edwards; D C, Wright; M L, Seager; T P, Schimberg; J J, Townsend; C B, Wilson;

Modified procarbazine, CCNU, and vincristine (PCV 3) combination chemotherapy in the treatment of malignant brain tumors.

Abstract

Fifty-eight patients harboring recurrent malignant brain tumors were evaluated. CCNU (110 mg/m2) was administered on Day 1, procarbazine (60 mg/m2) was administered daily for 14 days beginning on Day 8, and vincristine (1.4 mg/m2) was administered on Days 8 and 29 of each 6-week cycle of therapy. Therapy was continued until tumor progression was documented. Before each course, a neurologic examination was performed and radionuclide and computerized tomographic scans were obtained. Response and progression were defined as improvement or deterioration, respectively, in at least two of the three tests. Of the 46 patients harboring recurrent malignant gliomas, 12 (26%) responded to therapy, 18 (39%) had tumor progression, and 16 (35%) had disease stability. Nineteen of the 46 patients were not previously treated with another form of chemotherapy: eight (42%) responded to therapy, eight (42%) had disease stability, and only three (16%) had early tumor progression. The median time to tumor progression was 26 weeks for patients responding to therapy or having disease stability. Approximately 30% of the patients were alive without evidence of tumor progression at 1 year. Evaluated by time to tumor progression and rate of tumor response or stabilization, this combination was similar to the BCNU-5-fluorouracil combination used for patients harboring recurrent malignant glioma.

Keywords

Time Factors, Brain Neoplasms, Glioma, Drug Administration Schedule, Nitrosourea Compounds, Lomustine, Vincristine, Procarbazine, Drug Evaluation, Humans, Drug Therapy, Combination, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    135
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
135
Top 10%
Top 1%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!