Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Evaluation of coronary heart disease by kinetocardiography and electrocardiography before and after injection of dopamine and isoproterenol].

Authors: C, Strozzi; G, Cocco; S, Christeller;

[Evaluation of coronary heart disease by kinetocardiography and electrocardiography before and after injection of dopamine and isoproterenol].

Abstract

Eighty patients with coronary insufficiency, with or without infarction, were studied by kinetocardiography and electrocardiography before and after the infusion of dopamine (40 patients) or isoproterenol (40 patients). Twenty healthy subjects for dopamine and 20 for isoproterenol served as controls. The basal ECG has a moderate (52.5%) sensitivity and a high (92.5%) specificity. KCG-25 has a poor (19,7%) sensitivity and a high (95%) specificity. KCG-45 has a high (76.2%) sensitivity and a moderate (50%) specificity, 25/40 healthy subjects had at least one pathological finding: either the ECG or the KCG-25 or the KCG-45. The mechanisms and the relevance of the false positives of the KCG are reviewed. In spite of different pharmacological properties, there is no statistical difference in the effect of dopamine and isoproterenol on the ECG and KCG. The KCG may be considered equivalent to the ECG, taking into account that it brings different information. The infusion of dopamine or isoproterenol induces dyskinesia in some patients with coronary insufficiency. Only two statistically significant changes were observed: dopamine increases the sensitivity of KCG-25 (up to 44.4%) and the specificity of KCG-45 (up to 95%). In selected cases the infusion of dopamine may be a useful test.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Adolescent, Dopamine, Isoproterenol, Coronary Disease, Heart, Middle Aged, Electrocardiography, Humans, Kinetocardiography, False Positive Reactions, Female, Child, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!