Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Problems of assessment and occupational rehabilitation of patients with malignant urogenital neoplasm].

Authors: L, Hoffmann; H J, Polak; B, Hudemann; D, Serfling; H, Riedel;

[Problems of assessment and occupational rehabilitation of patients with malignant urogenital neoplasm].

Abstract

The expert opinion and the rehabilitation of patients with urogenital tumours often render great problems and tasks for the urologist. A schematic invalidisation of these patients is to be refused. The leading idea of an expert opinion should be the rehabilitation. This demands from the expert a judgment of the function with evaluation of the oncological prognosis quoad vitam and a judgment of the remaining functions of the treated organism as well as a recommendation for the further professional activity based on this judgment. A close cooperation with industrial institutions, the factory public health, the medical advisory commissions and the rehabilitation commissions is necessary for rehabilitation. The notion of rehabilitation--professional as well as social--is to be extended to the not unconsiderable number of patients at pensioner's age. The resumption of a suitable work effects in a patient sith successfully treated tumour disease the improvement of the general physico-psychic resistance, increases the will to recovery and activity and furthers the acclimatization and adaptation to remaining disturbances. Thus expert opinion in the sense of rehabilitation is also a therapy. The results of modern tumour therapy should not be measured only at the survival rates, but also at the degree of the social and professional rehabilitation of the patients.

Keywords

Male, Disability Evaluation, Humans, Female, Germany, East, Rehabilitation, Vocational, Prognosis, Urogenital Neoplasms

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!