Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Vacuum extraction in modern obstetrics].

Authors: P, Draca; L, Nikolić; M, Maticki;

[Vacuum extraction in modern obstetrics].

Abstract

From 1970 to 1979 the authors analysed 1721 vacuum extractions. The method was introduced into the Department in 1965 and performed in 0.96% of cases. From 1970 to 1980 the use of VE increased from 1.97% to 4.93%. The most frequent indication for its use was the prolonged expulsion phase (49.78%). While in premature children the method was applied rarely (2.32%), in children weighing over 4000 g it was indicated in 16.44% of cases. The newborns delivered by VE proved to have increased traumatic morbidity rates (anoxia perinatalis 25.56%, haemorrhagia intracranialis 20.39%, cephalhaematoma 33.58%). The mortality of newborns delivered by VE amounted to 6.39%. There was 1.10% of unsuccessful vacuum extractions (19 parturients: in 16 forceps and in 3 cesarean section were applied). In the authors' opinion, vacuum extraction is the method of choice in the vaginal operative completion of labour: VE does not diminish the pelvic cavity or fix the position of the head of the fetus but allows the flexion of the head by natural forces. After each unsuccessful vacuum extraction it is necessary to examine its causes. The choice of the method for completing labour depends on the obstetric situation. Intracranial hemorrhages amounting to 20.39% warn the authors to reexamine the methods of their work.

Keywords

Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical, Pregnancy, Birth Injuries, Infant, Newborn, Birth Weight, Humans, Extraction, Obstetrical, Female, Infant, Newborn, Diseases, Cerebral Hemorrhage

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!