Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors: H, Caglar; S, Tamer; M M, Hreshchyshyn;

Vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia.

Abstract

The authors reviewed the records of 50 patients with carcinoma in situ of the vulva seen at the State University of New York at Buffalo affiliated hospitals. Five patients (10%) were found to be immunosuppressed and 12 (24%) had other preinvasive and invasive genital or extragenital neoplasia. Of 43 patients whose symptomatology was available, almost half (46.5%) were asymptomatic. The most common symptom was vulvar itching in 18 (42%), and 32 (65%) patients had white vulvar lesions. Thirteen patients underwent vulvectomy, 23 underwent wide local excision, 8 underwent skinning and skin graft, 3 underwent topical 5-fluorouracil treatment, and 2 underwent CO2 laser treatment. On follow-up there were 6 patients with recurrent and/or persistent disease. Two recurrences followed wide local excision. Topical 5-fluorouracil failed in all 3 patients and CO2 laser failed in 1 of the 2 underwent laser treatment. There were 5 patients with invasive disease. In 3, diagnostic biopsy failed to reveal invasive neoplasia before surgical excision, and invasion was noted after 5-fluorouracil application in one and after CO2 laser treatment in another. All recurrences responded to therapy. In 41 patients followed up for 3 months to 11 years, there were no cancer-related deaths.

Keywords

Adult, Immunosuppression Therapy, Adolescent, Vulvar Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Pruritus Vulvae, Neoplasms, Multiple Primary, Humans, Female, Fluorouracil, Laser Therapy, Carcinoma in Situ, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    27
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
27
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!