Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Comparison of light-scattering index 50% (LSI50) and inhibitory concentration 50% (CI50) (author's transl)].

Authors: S S, Chung; H B, Drugeon; A, Reynaud; A L, Courtieu;

[Comparison of light-scattering index 50% (LSI50) and inhibitory concentration 50% (CI50) (author's transl)].

Abstract

The "Autobac" apparatus permitted the rapid determination of the light-scattering index 50% (LSI50) and inhibitory concentration 50% (CI50) of eight antibiotics -- kanamycin, amikacin, lividomycin, gentamicin, tobramycin, sisomicin, netilmicin and colistin -- for the strain of Escherichia coli ATCC-25922. The results were compared with those of the reference method using an agar dilution method. The percentage of inhibition (% I) was obtained from LSI by applying the formula % I = 10(-(GIXLSI)). The growth index (GI) has an influence on the values of the rapid method. The best results were observed in the GI ranges of 1.2 to 1.7. For all the antibiotics except tobramycin and colistin, the CI50 values of the two methods were very similar. The values of LSI50 were not assimiliated to those of CI50. These three parameters had a small variability. The averages of standard deviation were 0.23 log2 for the CI50 of the reference method, 0.24 log2 for the CI50 of the rapid method and 0.32 log2 for the LSI50. The "Autobac" enables the determination of CI50 by a simpler and faster technique.

Keywords

Light, Escherichia coli, Scattering, Radiation, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Anti-Bacterial Agents

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!