Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Electroresection and electrocoagulation as therapy for vulvar neoplasms].

Authors: K, Weghaupt;

[Electroresection and electrocoagulation as therapy for vulvar neoplasms].

Abstract

A survey of the results attained by the most prominent authors of the individual therapy methods is given. After electro-resection and -coagulation of the vulvar tumor followed by roentgen or telecobalt irradiation, patients are almost without pain. The primary mortality in 332 patients was 1,5% (= 5 cases) because lymphonodectomy was performed in only 66 cases (20%). The period of hospitalization lasts about four weeks and cosmetic healing is excellent. This therapy method can also be recommended for largely extended tumors as lack of local symptoms can be achieved up to 97%. Of the 332 patients treated at our hospital, almost equal numbers of patients were seen with carcinoma stage I and II and stage III and IV. In stage I and II (negative lymph nodes) 74,5% and in stage III and IV (positive lymph nodes) 38,4% were cured. 80% were aged between 61 and 90 years. In spite of this negative selection of patients which was also combined with the intercurrent mortality rate of 13% (= 43 cases), 193 of the 332 patients or 58,1% survived five years or longer. In the last five years the survival rate was even 62,2%. A survey of the results obtained by electrocoagulation in the last 30 years is given. Especially the enormous increase of high risks as diabetes (42,2%) and the great number of over-aged patients (83,3%) are emphasized.

Keywords

Postoperative Care, Vulvar Neoplasms, Electrocoagulation, Electrosurgery, Humans, Female, Thrombosis, Lymph Nodes, Cobalt Radioisotopes, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!