Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

In vitro studies of amphibian gastrula cells.

Authors: J, LeBlanc; I, Brick;

In vitro studies of amphibian gastrula cells.

Abstract

Experiments are presented to determine whether Rana pipiens gastrula cells differentiate in vitro as they do in vivo with respect to rate, morphology and spreading characteristics. Comparisons are made between presumptive germ layer cells isolated at late blastula, cultured for 24 h, and the same cell types form late gastrula cultured for 1 h (LeBlanc and Brick, 1981a). These cells are chronologically similar and should be morphologically similar at the end of their respective culture periods if in vivo and in vitro differentiation are proceeding in the same direction and rate. Five hour cultures of the same cell types were compared to 1 h cultures in media with enhanced Ca2+ (LeBlanc and Brick, 1981b) to study the role of Ca2+ as a modulator of spreading and production of cell protrusions, and the rate at which these occur, as these relate to morphogenetic movements. The data and inferences can be summarized as follows: (1) Some Rana pipiens late blastula and gastrula cells appear to differentiate morphologically in vitro similarly to their differentiation in vivo. (2) In vitro differentiation is autonomous indicating that determination occurred prior to late blastula, mid-gastrula or late gastrula depending on when cells were isolated. (3) The presence of two sub-populations is some germ layer cell isolate indicates determinative interactions had occurred prior to isolation. (4) Morphologic similarity of cells in standard culture for 5 h to the same cells in culture with additional Ca2+ for 1 h suggests that Ca2+ modulates spreading and projection formation and the rate at which these occur. (5) The upper cell surface of these cells may provide adhesive sites for plasmalemma projections from adjacent cells.

Keywords

Rana pipiens, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Animals, Calcium, Cell Differentiation, Gastrula

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!