Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Management of labor after previous cesarean section].

Authors: G, Scholtes; H, Milz;

[Management of labor after previous cesarean section].

Abstract

Knowledge of the recent literature and evaluation of 210 deliveries in our own hospital are intended to help to provide an assessment of delivery management after prior cesarean section. In 56.6% of the cases, resection was chosen as the mode of delivery after cesarean section. The primary resection rate was 29.5% and the secondary rate 27.1%. Protracted labour is the main indication (around 60%) for secondary resection. Secondary resection is subject of a high maternal morbidity. The overall rate of uterine ruptures in the patients (1.4%) corresponds to the international level. 43.4% of the patients were delivered vaginally, 15.4% of these by vacuum extraction. An individualized procedure is necessary and to be aimed for in view of the problems discussed. The conclusions emphasize the main points of the procedure in management and delivery of pregnant women with a cesarean section in the case history.

Keywords

Reoperation, Postoperative Complications, Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical, Uterine Rupture, Cesarean Section, Pregnancy, Placenta Previa, Humans, Female, Delivery, Obstetric, Dystocia, Obstetric Labor Complications

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!