Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Analysis of the myogenic lineage in chick embryos. IV. Effects of conditioned medium.

Authors: L S, Quinn; M, Nameroff;

Analysis of the myogenic lineage in chick embryos. IV. Effects of conditioned medium.

Abstract

Immunocytochemical analysis of small myogenic clones was used to compare the effects of fresh medium (FM) and conditioned medium (CM) on muscle differentiation. In order to compare the same population of cells, clones were initiated in FM and then switched to either new FM or to CM. Clones were fixed at 12-hour intervals up to 76 hours, then assayed for the presence of post-mitotic myoblasts by immunoperoxidase staining for muscle myosin heavy chain (MHC) or M-creatine kinase (MCK). In both media, myogenic cells occurred predominantly in homogeneous positive clones (all cells (MHC +/MCK +) which contained 2" cells. At 76 hours, the percentages of 1-, 2-, and 4-cell positive clones did not differ statistically in the two conditions; however, the percentages of 8- and 16-cell positive clones were significantly reduced in CM, and the percentages of small negative clones were concomitantly increased. We conclude from these data that CM affects myogenesis by slowing progression through a predetermined lineage rather than by changing the number of mitoses an individual cell will undergo before terminally differentiating. These results further support the idea that progress through the myogenic lineage is mediated by cell divisions.

Keywords

Muscles, Cell Differentiation, Chick Embryo, Myosins, Clone Cells, Culture Media, Kinetics, Animals, Mitogens, Creatine Kinase, Cell Division

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    12
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
12
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!