
On the basis of their answers to a self-administered questionnaire, 697 nonsmoking healthy subjects were chosen from a randomly selected sample representative of the white non-Mexican-American population of Tucson, Arizona, enrolled in a longitudinal study of respiratory health. For each subject, the first satisfactory set of flow-volume data obtained during the first 3 consecutive surveys was selected for analysis. For forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), the single best value for each subject was selected. Other flow-volume measurements were derived from the single test with the best sum FEV, plus FVC. These data were used to derive improved prediction equations for each sex by age group for 5 spirometric and flow-volume variables. The resulting predicted values demonstrate the effects of development, maturation, and senescence on ventilatory function. "Normal" limits are proposed that take into consideration the between-subject variability and non-Gaussian distribution of the various measurements.
Adult, Male, Aging, Adolescent, Respiration, Maximal Midexpiratory Flow Rate, Forced Expiratory Flow Rates, Growth, Middle Aged, Random Allocation, Reference Values, Forced Expiratory Volume, Humans, Female, Longitudinal Studies, Prospective Studies, Child, Lung, Aged, Maximal Expiratory Flow-Volume Curves
Adult, Male, Aging, Adolescent, Respiration, Maximal Midexpiratory Flow Rate, Forced Expiratory Flow Rates, Growth, Middle Aged, Random Allocation, Reference Values, Forced Expiratory Volume, Humans, Female, Longitudinal Studies, Prospective Studies, Child, Lung, Aged, Maximal Expiratory Flow-Volume Curves
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2K | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 0.01% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
