Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Five-year report on partial ossicular replacement prostheses and total ossicular replacement prostheses.

Authors: G D, Smyth;

Five-year report on partial ossicular replacement prostheses and total ossicular replacement prostheses.

Abstract

Although much progress has been achieved in the functional restoration of ears damaged by chronic suppurative otitis media since the introduction of tympanoplasty 30 years ago, adequate hearing improvements in ears with loss of the stapedial arch have been the most elusive. It is now recognized that such ears present the surgeon with numerous associated problems that require control for a satisfactory outcome; the problem of establishing an efficient link between the tympanic membrane and oval window has proved the most difficult. The introduction of biocompatible materials was heralded as a possible solution. In order to evaluate the claims for these new materials, the five-year results obtained with one of these, porous polyethylene, were evaluated. The one-year success rate with partial ossicular replacement prostheses was 64%; the five-year success rate was 43%. With total ossicular replacement prostheses the success rate was 59% at one year and 22% at five years. These poor results, coupled with evidence of digestion of porous polyethylene, give little justification for the continued use of this material in tympanoplasty.

Keywords

Tympanoplasty, Humans, Prostheses and Implants, Polyethylenes, Ear Ossicles, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    69
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
69
Average
Top 1%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!