Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Determination of the minimum bactericidal concentration. Influence of various technical factors].

Authors: A, Thabaut; M, Meyran;

[Determination of the minimum bactericidal concentration. Influence of various technical factors].

Abstract

Measurement of minimal bactericidal concentrations of antibiotics is requisite to select the most appropriate drugs in severe infections. However, MBC assays are reliable only if the various technical modalities are well-standardized. We determined MBCs of ampicillin (E. coli), gentamicin (E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus), cefazolin (E. coli), ticarcillin (P. aeruginosa), and oxacillin (S. aureus), for different values of a number of parameters : inoculum from a 4 h and 18 h culture, measurement of MBC for 99.9% and 99.99% of bacteria, plate microdilution and macrodilution in plastic or glass test tubes, inoculation under a 1 ml or 0.1 ml volume, determination of MIC and subculture at the 24th hour, with or without Vortex agitation at the 20th hour. Most MBCs were identical for 99.9% and 99.99% of bacteria. Conversely, results were significantly modified by changes in other factors. Very high MBCs were consistently found in plastic tubes. MBCs were higher after inoculation under a 1 ml volume than under a 0.1 ml volume. MBC was usually similar to MIC with the microdilution technique, or with glass tubes, inoculation under a 0.1 ml volume and subculture at the 24th hour following Vortex agitation at the 20th hour.

Keywords

Bacteria, Reference Values, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Anti-Bacterial Agents

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!