Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

[Reproducibility of the results of bronchial reactivity tests].

Authors: D, Kandt;

[Reproducibility of the results of bronchial reactivity tests].

Abstract

383 patients with a bronchial hyperreactivity were repeatedly investigated during an observation period of 3 up to 6 years. The inhalative provocation test with nebulized histamine solution was used. Forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) were measured by spirometry. The reduction of FEV1 in per cent of the initial value marked the degree of the bronchial hyperreactivity. The normalization was depending on the degree of the initial bronchial hyperreactivity. In 148 patients (36.6%) the provocation test results were normalized, e.g. FEV1 decreased less than 15% of the initial value. Patients with a low degree of the bronchial hyperreactivity, that means a decrease of FEV1 between 15 and 30% of the initial value, demonstrated the normalization of the provocation test significantly more frequent than patients with a higher degree of bronchial hyperreactivity. There was a considerable difference in course of the bronchial hyperreactivity of smokers and non-smokers. The latter tended to a more frequent normalization. A further influence of the course was stated with the age of patients. The younger ones had a higher tendency to normalization. Patients suffering from asthma bronchiale were mostly in the group with a higher degree of bronchial hyperreactivity and showed a rather stable course of it.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Adolescent, Smoking, Middle Aged, Asthma, Bronchial Provocation Tests, Bronchodilator Agents, Adrenal Cortex Hormones, Respiratory Hypersensitivity, Humans, Female, Lung Diseases, Obstructive, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!