Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Transplant conditioning and transplant size in heterotopic autologous spleen transplantation].

Authors: W, Pimpl; W, Wayand; J, Thalhammer; A, Trost;

[Transplant conditioning and transplant size in heterotopic autologous spleen transplantation].

Abstract

In an experimental study we compared two methods of preparing transplants in rabbits (n = 66): 4-5 splenic fragments with a thickness of 1 mm and graduated weight (5-800 mg) were attached onto the peritoneal peritoneum. Splenic homogenates with increasing weight (5-800 mg) were placed in 4-5 preformed pockets in the parietal peritoneum. At different postoperative intervals (maximum 42 days), a relaparotomy was performed. The regenerated splenic tissue was dissected, weighted and histologically examined. We found a linear correlation between pre- and postoperative weight. However, this correlation applies only to the homogenates with a weight of maximal 200 mg and to the fragments with a weight of maximal 300 mg. We have come to the conclusion that homogenates regenerate better than fragments.

Keywords

Male, Necrosis, Splenectomy, Animals, Regeneration, Female, Organ Size, Rabbits, Transplantation, Autologous, Spleen

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!