Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Pleural pressure during thoracocentesis in patients with pleural neoplasms].

Authors: J M, Velardocchio; C, Boutin; M, Irisson;

[Pleural pressure during thoracocentesis in patients with pleural neoplasms].

Abstract

In 45 patients with cancerous pleural effusion, thoracocentesis was performed according to the following technique : after local anaesthesia (5 ml of 2% lidocaine) in the posterior part of the 6th intercostal space, thoracocentesis was carried out with a blunt trocar connected to a water manometer. The pleural pressure was measured before removal of the fluid (Po). Then three different techniques of drainage (active suction at -- 80 or -- 40 mmHg or underwater sealed drainage) were randomized. Pleural pressure was measured after removal of every 100 ml and at the end of the procedure (PT). The mean Po +/- SD was respectively -- 4.08 +/- 2.95, -- 3.81 +/- 3.12 and -- 2.53 +/- 2.42 cmH2O for the three different groups of drainage. After drainage, PT was decreased in the three groups, especially after -- 80 mmHg aspiration. In 14 patients, side effects occurred during thoracocentesis and the procedure was stopped. Symptoms, chiefly cough, occurred after a mean removal of 1.1 +/- 0.7 1. PT in these patients was statistically lower (-- 18 +/- 5.59 cmH2O) than in the 31 asymptomatic patients (--11.40 +/- 5.75 cmH2O) (p less than 0.001). In conclusion, the assessment of the pleural pressure during thoracocentesis seems to be convenient in order to prevent any complication of pleural evacuation : pleural evacuation should be stopped if the pleural pressure decreased below -- 18 cmH2O. A depression at -- 80 mmHg is too dangerous for pleural aspiration; -- 40 mmHg or under water sealed drainage are both convenient for a safe and complete evacuation.

Keywords

Male, Pleural Effusion, Pleural Neoplasms, Pressure, Drainage, Humans, Pleura, Female, Punctures, Middle Aged, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!