Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Work-related risk factors for laryngeal cancer.

Authors: W D, Flanders; C I, Cann; K J, Rothman; M P, Fried;

Work-related risk factors for laryngeal cancer.

Abstract

The authors conducted a case-control study to identify employment-related risk factors for laryngeal cancer. Richmond County, Georgia, and the contiguous counties were chosen as the study area because the 1950-1969 laryngeal cancer mortality rate for white males in Richmond County was almost double the corresponding rate for the entire United States, and because a large proportion of the working population was employed in industries for which excess risk among workers had been reported. All persons with newly diagnosed squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx treated in the area hospitals were identified. Potential controls were selected from patients admitted to these hospitals during the same time period as the cases, excluding those patients admitted for cancer, lung disease, or employment-related disease. Eighty-five control subjects were individually matched to 42 cases for sex, age, area of residence, and smoking and alcohol-drinking history. From lifetime employment histories, laryngeal cancer rate ratios were estimated comparing the incidence rate among subjects who had ever worked in an occupation with the incidence rate among subjects who had never worked in that occupation. Among the 10 occupations in which at least 15 subjects had worked, the authors found rate ratio estimates above 3.0 for farmers, textile processors who separated, filtered or dried textile fibers, and for all laborers and maintenance personnel.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Georgia, Alcohol Drinking, Smoking, Middle Aged, Hospital Records, Occupational Diseases, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Humans, Female, Epidemiologic Methods, Laryngeal Neoplasms, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    62
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
62
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!