Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Hypertensive retinopathy].

Authors: G, Chaine; E M, Kohner;

[Hypertensive retinopathy].

Abstract

Retinal blood vessels differ from most other vessels in the body (with the exception of those in the brain) in two important respects. The first is the presence of blood-retinal barriers, best illustrated by fluorescein angiography. The second important difference is that retinal vessels do not have sympathetic innervation and blood flow is modulated by autoregulation mechanisms. In 1939 Keith, Wagener and Barker proposed a classification system for hypertensive retinopathy which was innovative and of prognostic importance at that time. However, the different features of hypertensive and arteriosclerotic vasculopathies are not adequately distinguished by this classification system. Clinical features of accelerated hypertension are retinal haemorrhages, cotton wool-spots, hard exudates, papilloedema and increased vascular permeability. These must be differentiated from features associated with arteriosclerosis which are arteriovenous crossing changes and arterial constriction. The advantages of the Hogan classification system, based up on histopathologic and pathogenetic considerations are discussed. Other retinal vascular diseases associated with hypertension are also mentioned. Such as toxaemia of pregnancy, arterial macroaneurysm and anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy. Retinal branch vein occlusion is rather associated with arteriosclerosis than with hypertension.

Keywords

Arteriosclerosis, Retinal Hemorrhage, Retinal Vessels, Diagnosis, Differential, Retinal Diseases, Hypertension, Optic Nerve Diseases, Animals, Humans, Fluorescein Angiography, Papilledema

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!