Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

The long-term results of proximal gastric vagotomy.

Authors: T, Kennedy; A, Spencer;

The long-term results of proximal gastric vagotomy.

Abstract

Since 1969 we have performed proximal gastric vagotomy (PGV) in 514 patients. PGV without drainage was performed, before 1978, in 304 patients with one death (0.3%) and of these, 242 have been followed for from five to 13 years. Good clinical results were achieved in 78% but there were 32 recurrent ulcers. When two patients with Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome were excluded the late recurrence rate was 12.7%. There was no difference between the clinical results of men and women. When all the recurrent ulcers and two patients with gastric retention had been treated, mostly by operation, good results were recorded in 90% of our series. We conclude that PGV is the best operation at present available for uncomplicated duodenal ulcer.

Keywords

Male, Time Factors, Vagotomy, Postoperative Complications, Recurrence, Duodenal Ulcer, Gastroesophageal Reflux, Humans, Female, Vagotomy, Proximal Gastric, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!