Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Antimicrobial prescribing errors in children.

Authors: Grimwood, K; Cook, JJ; Abbott, GD;

Antimicrobial prescribing errors in children.

Abstract

During a 120 day period, the charts of patients who had received antimicrobial agents were examined. This group numbered 255 and comprised 52% of children admitted with infections. Patients treated by family doctors and/or hospital staff predominantly had respiratory infections and the ampicillin/amoxycillin group of drugs was most commonly prescribed. Of the 203 antimicrobial agents prescribed by hospital staff, 64% were considered to be prescribed appropriately. The major errors related to dosage, the most potentially serious relating to the prescribing of aminoglycosides and chloramphenicol. Of the 203 antimicrobial agents prescribed for 171 children in the community, 11% were considered to be appropriately prescribed or without error. The major error was the prescribing of these drugs for syndromes of known viral aetiology. Errors were also frequent in relation to dosage, duration and choice of antimicrobial agents.

Country
Australia
Related Organizations
Keywords

Infant, Newborn, Infant, Bacterial Infections, Drug Administration Schedule, Drug Utilization, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Child, Preschool, Urinary Tract Infections, Humans, Child, Respiratory Tract Infections

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!