
Pigs vaccinated with a killed 6-hour culture of Haemophilus pleuropneumoniae serotype 2 with Freund's incomplete adjuvant were not protected against challenge with serotypes 1, 5, 6 or 8. Equivalent results were obtained when pigs were vaccinated with serotypes 4 or 5 and challenged with serotype 2. In earlier studies of immunity induced by intranasal immunization with live H. pleuropneumoniae organisms, it was clearly shown that intranasal inoculation with one serotype of H. pleuropneumoniae would induce a strong immunity to both homologous and heterologous serotypes (Nielsen 1979). The present study has shown that cross immunity is not obtained with parenteral immunization. The results strongly suggest that the immune response of the pig to parenteral vaccination is different from the response seen after natural infection, and indicate that an important part of the defence mechanism against H. pleuropneumoniae infection is a local immune-barrier which is effective in preventing the bacterium from penetrating the mucosa. In earlier vaccination experiments 90 per cent of vaccinates were protected against homologous challenge (Nielsen 1976). In the present work a vaccine containing serotypes 1 through 6 was fully protective against serotypes 2 and 3 and also against serotype 8, which shares antigenic determinants with serotypes 3 and 6. These results indicate that the protection obtained by parenteral immunization is serotype-specific. Vaccines must therefore contain the serotypes existing in the swine population.
Swine Diseases, Vaccines, Haemophilus Infections, Swine, Haemophilus, Animals, Pleuropneumonia, Contagious
Swine Diseases, Vaccines, Haemophilus Infections, Swine, Haemophilus, Animals, Pleuropneumonia, Contagious
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 93 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
