Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures in adolescents. Normal values.

Authors: R J, Smyth; K R, Chapman; A S, Rebuck;

Maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures in adolescents. Normal values.

Abstract

The measurement of maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures at the mouth (MIP and MEP, respectively) provides a noninvasive clinical method for evaluating the strength of respiratory muscles. In an attempt to reconcile the widely divergent normal values reported in the literature for healthy adolescents, we have measured, using simple manometry, MIP and MEP in 112 white subjects, 76 adolescents and 36 healthy adults. For female adolescents the values for MIP and MEP were 76 +/- 25 and 86 +/- 22 cm H2O, respectively, and were significantly less than those for male adolescents (p less than 0.01), whose mean values were 107 +/- 26 and 114 +/- 35 cm H2O, respectively. Mean values for adolescents were comparable to values measured in adult control subjects, and for both adolescents and adults, mean values approximated the lower end of the previously reported ranges of normal values in healthy subjects. Thus, MIP and MEP in healthy adolescents are significantly greater in male subjects than female subjects, but are comparable to those of healthy adults of the same sex. Furthermore, these studies suggest that the choice of normal values for MIP and MEP must take into account significant methodologic differences among laboratories.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Adolescent, Respiration, Total Lung Capacity, Vital Capacity, Age Factors, Respiratory Function Tests, Residual Volume, Sex Factors, Reference Values, Spirometry, Forced Expiratory Volume, Pressure, Humans, Female

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    108
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
108
Top 10%
Top 1%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!