Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Outcome of ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated in accordance with the principle of deferred surgery. 308 consecutive cases over an 11 year period].

Authors: R, Deruty; P, Bret; J, Capdeville; C, Mottolese;

[Outcome of ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated in accordance with the principle of deferred surgery. 308 consecutive cases over an 11 year period].

Abstract

The diagnosis of the aneurysm rupture either was assessed at the time of admission, or was assessed after the admission into the surgical department. Most patients were admitted after the first 24 hours following the S.A.H. From the beginning the patients were separated in two groups: 1) The patients unsuitable for planned surgery (grade V--Botterrel, or general contra-indication, such as neoplasm), 2) The patients planned for surgery and called much less than operable patients much greater than (grade I to IV--Botterell, without extra neurological contra-indication). The general management attitude consisted of the delayed surgery according to the neurological status of the patients, and the risk of vaso spasm and ischemia. Thus, in most cases, the surgery was delayed after the 9th day, following S.A.H., and even after the 12th day for anterior communicating aneurysms. The following results were observed: 1) Unoperable patients: (15) The 12 patients in grade V at the time of admission died (with or without emergency surgery). The 3 patients with a general contra-indication have been lost of view. 2) 293 patients were considered for delayed surgery: 16 died before the day of surgery (5,5%). Out of these much less than operable and no operated patients much greater than, 10 died from cerebral ischemia (3,4% of operable patients) and 6 died from hemorrhage recurrence (2%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Keywords

Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Time Factors, Recurrence, Age Factors, Humans, Intracranial Aneurysm, Middle Aged, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Aged, Brain Ischemia

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    7
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
7
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!