Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Esophageal M mode echocardiography].

Authors: G, Chivoret; E, Aliot; J F, Bruntz; P, Viriot; J M, Gilgenkrantz;

[Esophageal M mode echocardiography].

Abstract

M mode echocardiography may be difficult or even impossible from the standard transducer positions (parasternal or subcostal) in obese, broncho-emphysematous patients and subjects with thoracic malformations. For this reason, the authors used the oesophageal route. A 2.25 MHz unfocused 11 mm diameter transducer was attached to a wire enabling it to be orientated. The patients were asked to swallow this probe after local anaesthesia. The aortic ring served as a landmark for other cardiac structures. The technique was well tolerated and no complications ensued. Fifty seven patients were examined: echocardiography from the standard positions was of mediocre quality in 55%. Excellent recordings were obtained by the oesophageal route, of the aortic ring (Ao, 100% of cases), of the aortic cusp opening (ACO, 92% of cases) and of the anterior mitral leaflet (AML, 96.5% of cases); the recording of the left ventricle was more difficult (LV, 45.5% of cases). Exceptionally good recording were obtained of the right heart. Correlations between the measurements made from the oesophageal and standard positions were excellent with respect to the aortic structures (Ao: r = 0.92; ACO: r = 0.92) and LV dimensions (systolic: r = 0.82; diastolic: r = 0.87). The correlations between the measurements of DE mitral valve amplitude, EF slope and left atrial dimension were mediocre (r = 0.63, r = 0.72 and r = 0.69, respectively). In 6 cases, this recording technique enabled a precise diagnosis to be made. Oesophageal echocardiography is simple and well tolerated and should effectively complete the arsenal of cardiological ultrasonic techniques.

Keywords

Esophagus, Heart Diseases, Echocardiography, Humans, Heart

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!