
M mode echocardiography may be difficult or even impossible from the standard transducer positions (parasternal or subcostal) in obese, broncho-emphysematous patients and subjects with thoracic malformations. For this reason, the authors used the oesophageal route. A 2.25 MHz unfocused 11 mm diameter transducer was attached to a wire enabling it to be orientated. The patients were asked to swallow this probe after local anaesthesia. The aortic ring served as a landmark for other cardiac structures. The technique was well tolerated and no complications ensued. Fifty seven patients were examined: echocardiography from the standard positions was of mediocre quality in 55%. Excellent recordings were obtained by the oesophageal route, of the aortic ring (Ao, 100% of cases), of the aortic cusp opening (ACO, 92% of cases) and of the anterior mitral leaflet (AML, 96.5% of cases); the recording of the left ventricle was more difficult (LV, 45.5% of cases). Exceptionally good recording were obtained of the right heart. Correlations between the measurements made from the oesophageal and standard positions were excellent with respect to the aortic structures (Ao: r = 0.92; ACO: r = 0.92) and LV dimensions (systolic: r = 0.82; diastolic: r = 0.87). The correlations between the measurements of DE mitral valve amplitude, EF slope and left atrial dimension were mediocre (r = 0.63, r = 0.72 and r = 0.69, respectively). In 6 cases, this recording technique enabled a precise diagnosis to be made. Oesophageal echocardiography is simple and well tolerated and should effectively complete the arsenal of cardiological ultrasonic techniques.
Esophagus, Heart Diseases, Echocardiography, Humans, Heart
Esophagus, Heart Diseases, Echocardiography, Humans, Heart
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
