Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

[Current state of radiotherapy of mouth neoplasms].

Authors: H L, Kölling;

pmid: 64090

[Current state of radiotherapy of mouth neoplasms].

Abstract

Beside surgery and chemotherapy, which has recently become important, radiotherapy is an efficacious means in the treatment of oral cavity cancer, both when applied alone and in combination. Clinical radiotherapy is based on the differences in sensitivity between normal tissue and tumor. The radiosensitivity of oral cavity cancers--above all squamous cell carcinoma--may even be considered to be mediocre: therefore a dose should be reached in order to destroy the malignant growth. In percutaneous radiotherapy orthovoltage is without any prospects; high-energy methods, above all telecobalt, have certain advantages, particularly the lower absorption in the bones. In "brachytherapy" we prefer the artificial nuclides 137Cs and 60Co instead of 226Ra for moulds and 198Au grains for interstitial application. At first the radiotherapist has to decide whether to advise radical or palliative treatment. Patients with secondary nodes in whom "radical surgery is inadvisable should have radical radiation therapy..." (Gibb and Todd) in a dose of nearly 5000 rads. Radiotherapy after an inradical neck dissection is burdened with a therapy before surgery can be considered in select cases. The treatment of oral cavity cancer should be practiced in close cooperation between the surgeon and the radiotherapist.

Keywords

Gold Radioisotopes, Cesium Radioisotopes, Lymphatic Metastasis, Palliative Care, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Humans, Neck Dissection, Mouth Neoplasms, Cobalt Radioisotopes, Radium

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?