Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Agonist binding to multiple muscarinic receptors.

Authors: T W, Vickroy; M, Watson; H I, Yamamura; W R, Roeske;

Agonist binding to multiple muscarinic receptors.

Abstract

The binding of agonists to muscarinic cholinergic receptors is well described by a binding model of multiple affinity states (superhigh, high, and low) in most central and peripheral tissues. Although previous studies of the influences by divalent cations, guanine nucleotides, and sulfhydryl reagents support the concept that these regulators act through closely related sites to alter the relative proportions of muscarinic agonist affinity states, it has become apparent that muscarinic receptor subtypes (as defined with the nonclassical antagonist pirenzepine) are differentially affected by the regulators. For example, in tissues that have few high-affinity [3H]pirenzepine-binding sites (heart, ileum, cerebellum), magnesium ions promote the formation of a high agonist affinity state, whereas exposure of these tissues to the sulfhydryl reagent N-ethylmaleimide (NEM) or guanine nucleotides promotes the formation of a low agonist affinity state. Conversely, tissues rich in high-affinity [3H]pirenzepine-binding sites (cerebral cortex, corpus striatum, hippocampus) show little, if any, change in agonist binding site affinity when magnesium ions or guanine nucleotides are present. Furthermore, NEM enhances the muscarinic binding site affinity for agonists in these tissues. Taken together, these results support the concept of muscarinic receptor heterogeneity, as proposed from previous physiological studies, and indicate that the aforementioned regulators (guanine nucleotides, magnesium ions, NEM) differentially alter the agonist-binding properties of these muscarinic receptor subtypes.

Keywords

Cerebral Cortex, Benzodiazepinones, Myocardium, Sulfhydryl Reagents, Dioxolanes, Pirenzepine, Binding, Competitive, Receptors, Muscarinic, Animals, Magnesium, Guanosine Triphosphate

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    57
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
57
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!