Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Human malignant melanoma: preclinical and clinical drug evaluation.

Authors: R, Osieka;

Human malignant melanoma: preclinical and clinical drug evaluation.

Abstract

A panel of 17 melanoma xenograft lines was exposed to various DNA reactive agents. Growth delay values were calculated from tumor volume responses of xenograft bearing mice and correlated with donor patient's response as determined by standard clinical criteria. Most donor patients were refractory to dacarbazine and received the combination of ifosfamide and cisplatin as secondary treatment. Clinical and preclinical responses correlated well for resistance in 26/27 instances, whereas sensitivity was observed consistently in only 9/12 instances. Incomplete cross-resistance among cisplatin, dacarbazine, dibromodulcitol, ifosfamide, methyl-CCNU, mitomycin C, and PHM has been observed after sequential drug exposures in clinical trials and was confirmed by simultaneous drug exposures in this panel of melanoma xenografts. Most xenograft lines revealed unique chemosensitivity patterns, which offer a therapeutic potential yet to be fully exploited in clinical therapy guided by predictive tests. Macromolecular DNA damage was compared in xenograft lines differing at least 100-fold in sensitivity to dacarbazine. Removal of DNA damage 24 hours after in vivo treatment with dacarbazine paralleled in vivo sensitivity. The preclinical and clinical data on responses to various DNA reactive drugs validate the xenograft model for therapeutic purposes. The model has found an additional application in analysis of the molecular pharmacology of response to in vivo drug treatment.

Keywords

Male, Clinical Trials as Topic, Transplantation, Heterologous, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Mice, Nude, Antineoplastic Agents, Bone Marrow Cells, DNA, Neoplasm, Mice, Animals, Humans, Female, Neoplasm Metastasis, Melanoma, Neoplasm Transplantation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!