
Platelet aggregation has been most commonly studied in vitro by measuring increases in light transmission as platelets aggregate in PRP. Recently, an electrical impedance method for measuring platelet aggregation has been introduced. This method can be used with either PRP or whole blood and measures an increase in impedance across electrodes placed in the blood samples as platelets accumulate on them. We have compared the results obtained by the two methods, using ADP and collagen as aggregating agents, and also have measured the secretion of platelet ATP simultaneously. Although the aggregometry results were similar, recordings obtained by the electrical method did not distinguish two waves of platelet aggregation or correlate with secretion as well as recordings obtained by the optical method. When PGI2 or PGE1 was added to the PRP, both the rate and extent of the increase in light transmittance were inhibited, but the main effect on the increase in impedance was a decrease in its rate and not in its extent. Increases in impedance and secretion of ATP were also measured in whole blood after the platelets had been labeled with a 125I-containing antibody specific for platelet surface glycoproteins. It appeared that the increases in impedance lagged several minutes behind the formation of platelet aggregates and the secretion of platelet ATP. It is suggested that there are advantages and disadvantages to both methods of measurement of platelet aggregation and that the parameters being measured must be clearly understood to properly interpret the results.
Blood Platelets, Iodine Radioisotopes, Optics and Photonics, Adenosine Triphosphate, Platelet Adhesiveness, Platelet Aggregation, Physiology, Prostaglandins E, Electric Conductivity, Epoprostenol
Blood Platelets, Iodine Radioisotopes, Optics and Photonics, Adenosine Triphosphate, Platelet Adhesiveness, Platelet Aggregation, Physiology, Prostaglandins E, Electric Conductivity, Epoprostenol
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 77 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
