Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Immunological analysis of hydatidiform mole and invasive mole (author's transl)].

Authors: K, Kanazawa; M, Ohno; H, Yuzawa; Y, Takeuchi; K, Takaishi; S, Nakamura; H, Yoshizawa; +1 Authors

[Immunological analysis of hydatidiform mole and invasive mole (author's transl)].

Abstract

Thirty-two cases of hydatidiform mole without endometrial invasion of chorial tissue and 17 of invasive mole were studied to ascertain whether these two diseases can be differentiated by various immune parameters. All of hydatidiform 11 of invasive mole were sampled at a state of "mole in utero" (pre-evacuation), but 6 of invasive mole were at a post-evacuation state, respectively. The results were summarized in the following items; 1. Serum total protein, especially albumin decreased with no significant difference in both groups. Globulin fractionation (alpha 1, alpha 2, beta, gamma-globulin) showed no characteristic changes. 2. A variation of immunoglobin (IgG, IgM, IgA) was similar in both. 3. Beta 1 C (a component of complement) increased in two groups, but no difference was revealed. 4. Leucocytosis was observed, but lymphocytosis was not detected in both groups. 5. Active E-RFC slightly increased, although total E-RFC and EAC-RFC were within normal range. But these findings were not statistically different in both. 6. In vitro lymphocyte-PHA-response was fairly depressed without a significant difference in two groups. 7. Suppressive effect of serum on lymphocyte-response was also slightly strengthened, but a difference in both was not significant. 8. The results of immune skin tests (PHA, PPD, SK-SD, Candida) could not be debated with liquid numbers studied.

Keywords

Diagnosis, Differential, Hydatidiform Mole, Invasive, Pregnancy, Uterine Neoplasms, Humans, Immunoglobulins, Female, Blood Proteins, Hydatidiform Mole, Lymphocyte Activation, Skin Tests

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!