Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

HLA-D and -DR antigens on human amniotic fluid cells. I. Lack of expression of HLA-D.

Authors: E, Valentine-Thon; G, Kreeb; H, Grosse-Wilde; E, Passarge;

HLA-D and -DR antigens on human amniotic fluid cells. I. Lack of expression of HLA-D.

Abstract

Human amniotic fluid cells, known to express HLA-A, -B, and -C antigens, were tested for the presence of lymphocyte-stimulating antigens (LD or HLA-D) using modifications of the mixed lymphocyte culture (MLC) and primed lymphocyte typing (PLT) tests. Peripheral blood lymphocytes were co-cultured with various concentrations of allogeneic amniotic fluid cells, either growing as a monolayer culture in microtiter plates or suspended in medium following treatment with trypsin. The kinetics of such mixed lymphocyte amniotic fluid cell culture (MLAC) reactions were followed during days 3 to 8. Under none of these conditions did amniotic fluid cells significantly stimulate allogeneic lymphocytes, even after lymphocytes were specifically primed in the PLT assay to the HLA-D antigens segregating in the family of the amniotic fluid cell donor. Furthermore, in three-cell experiments, amniotic fluid cells failed to inhibit an ongoing MLC reaction, indicating that the absence of proliferative response to amniotic fluid cells is not due to active suppression. Taken together, these data strongly suggest that amniotic fluid cells either do not express HLA-D antigens or do not express them in a form that is detectable in either primary or secondary MLC.

Keywords

Genes, MHC Class II, Histocompatibility Antigens Class II, Infant, HLA-DR Antigens, Amniotic Fluid, Lymphocyte Activation, Kinetics, Pregnancy, Humans, Female, Lymphocyte Culture Test, Mixed

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!