
Although microelectrode measurements have caused a good deal of confusion in the investigation of renal electrolyte transport (for literature see Ref.4), we cannot do without them. Knowledge of the electrical potential steps, which the ions have to pass during their reabsorption, is indispensable for understanding the transport mechanisms involved. Hence the development of more reliable methods to measure the electrical properties of kidney tubules was an important as well as challenging problem. This paper deals with some of the advances effected in our laboratory in the past 5 years. The properties of microelectrodes that present the major problems are: 1. The invisibility of the electrode tip, 2. The instability of the tip potential, and 3. The instability of the tip resistance. Since a brief description of resistance measurement problems has been published elsewhere recently (14), only the first two points will be discussed here. Simple microscopic observation alone can never tell whether the invisible microelectrode tip has penetrated the invisible cell membrane. In order to decide whether the tip sticks within a cell or whether it has reached the tubular lumen a number of localization methods have been developed.
Time Factors, Cell Membrane, Punctures, Epithelium, Membrane Potentials, Rats, Kidney Tubules, Proximal, Kidney Tubules, Methods, Animals, Oligochaeta, Kidney Tubules, Distal, Microelectrodes
Time Factors, Cell Membrane, Punctures, Epithelium, Membrane Potentials, Rats, Kidney Tubules, Proximal, Kidney Tubules, Methods, Animals, Oligochaeta, Kidney Tubules, Distal, Microelectrodes
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 23 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
