Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole compared with sulfamethoxazole in urinary tract infection.

Authors: G, Lemieux;

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole compared with sulfamethoxazole in urinary tract infection.

Abstract

Thirty-nine subjects with active non-obstructive urinary tract infection due to common pathogens were treated in a randomized fashion either with sulfamethoxazole alone (22 patients) or a combination of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (17 patients) during four consecutive weeks in the course of a controlled study. The combination trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole appeared more effective than sulfamethoxazole alone in eradicating infection. Complete disappearance of urinary tract infection was obtained in 82% of subjects treated with the combination versus 59% in those treated with sulfamethoxazole alone. Recurrence of infection averaged 43% in the group treated with the combination and 54% in those treated with sulfamethoxazole alone. The mean time interval between successful response and recurrence of infection was 17 weeks for the combination and 20 weeks for sulfamethoxazole alone. When the comparison of the results between sulfamethoxazole alone and the combination trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is restricted to the subjects with E. coli infection (69% of all cases), no important difference between the two groups can be demonstrated. A skin rash which sometimes disappeared spontaneously despite continued medication was the only side effect noted with the trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole combination.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Time Factors, Sulfamethoxazole, Middle Aged, Urine, Trimethoprim, Drug Combinations, Recurrence, Urinary Tract Infections, Humans, Female, Escherichia coli Infections, Aged, Tablets

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    9
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
9
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!