
Based on analysis of more than 2,500 forced vital capacity (FVC) maneuvers, we examined 2 aspects of the standards for spirometry recommended by the 1977 Snowbird Workshop concerning the timing of the FVC maneuver. We compared the forced expiratory volume in one sec (FEV1) when timing was initiated by the back extrapolation method with FEV1 when timing was initiated by flow or volume threshold to determine whether the latter offered a reliable equivalent. Although the mean differences appear to be relatively small, because of variability in initiating expiratory effort, neither alternative is likely to offer a uniformly accurate numeric equivalent to backward extrapolation. We also measured the volume expired before the initiation of the timing as a per cent of FVC to determine whether 10 per cent was a reasonable limit to apply for acceptability of a test. Although 2 SD from the mean of 4.35 per cent were well within this limit, it appears that the technician's judgment of acceptability is sufficient in most cases.
Time Factors, Spirometry, Forced Expiratory Volume, Vital Capacity, Humans
Time Factors, Spirometry, Forced Expiratory Volume, Vital Capacity, Humans
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
