
pmid: 4209642
handle: 10019.1/7760
A comparative evaluation of reagin tests (Wassermann, VDRL, RPR) and fluorescent treponema antibody absorption tests (FTA-ABS) performed on blood specimens from 5 271 persons (2 493 pregnant women, 1 130 apparently healthy prospective employees, 1 345 newborn babies and 303 leprosy patients) showed that 17,2% of the pregnant women, 11,95% of the prospective employees, 19,0% of the newborn babies, and 27,2% of the leprosy patients gave positive reactions in one or more of the tests. The majority of specimens were from Cape Coloured patients. FTA-ABS tests allowed the exclusion as biological false positives of ±30% of the pregnant 'positive reactors', of ±37% of the prospective employees, 40,2% of the newborn babies, but only 1% of the leprosy patients. The FTA-ABS test, therefore, deserves wide acceptance as the standard by which the diagnosis of syphilis is confirmed and false positive reactions are defined, although non-specificity in pregnancies, intracellular infections and auto-immune diseases occurs. The classical reagin tests are of value in the control of treatment.S. Afr. Med. J., 48, 1191 (1974).
Male, Occupational Medicine, Cardiolipins, Syphilis -- Diagnosis -- Wassermann reaction, Immunology, 610, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Microbiology, Absorption, 618, Bacterial Proteins, Pregnancy, Leprosy, Humans, False Positive Reactions, Ultrasonics, Syphilis, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Syphilis, Congenital, Infant, Newborn, Flocculation Tests, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Syphilis Serodiagnosis, Mycobacterium leprae, Female
Male, Occupational Medicine, Cardiolipins, Syphilis -- Diagnosis -- Wassermann reaction, Immunology, 610, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Microbiology, Absorption, 618, Bacterial Proteins, Pregnancy, Leprosy, Humans, False Positive Reactions, Ultrasonics, Syphilis, Pregnancy Complications, Infectious, Syphilis, Congenital, Infant, Newborn, Flocculation Tests, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Syphilis Serodiagnosis, Mycobacterium leprae, Female
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
