Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Consensus Recommendations on the use of PFAS-containing ocular endotamponades.

Authors: Mario R, Romano; Mariantonia, Ferrara; Martin, Zinkernagel; David H, Steel; Salvador, Pastor-Idoate; Antonio, Boccardi; Aude, Couturier; +13 Authors

Consensus Recommendations on the use of PFAS-containing ocular endotamponades.

Abstract

To develop recommendations on the use of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)-containing ocular endotamponades (OEs) in vitreoretinal surgery.We conducted an expert-led consensus using a modified Delphi methodology with panel consisting of fourteen vitreoretinal surgeons and five representatives of companies involved in OEs production and marketing. Based on a literature review and the latest updates on European Union's PFAS restriction proposal, the facilitator prepared a list of statements on PFAS-containing OEs currently used. Each statement was graded individually using a nine-point scale (from 1 "absolutely disagree" to 9 "absolutely agree") and the consensus was defined as a score between 7 and 9 from ≥80% of members.After two rounds, and related discussion, the recommendations highlighted the crucial role of PFAS-containing OEs in surgical practice and the potential negative impact of their ban on patients' outcomes. There was a strong agreement on the need of perfluorocarbon liquids as intraoperative tool, although it was also pointed out that their use should be avoided if possible. Fluorinated gases were deemed essential with no agreement on the possibility to replace SF6 and/or C2F6 with C3F8 at different concentrations. Conversely, semifluorinated alkanes as rinsing solution as well as F6H8 were considered extraneous. No consensus was reached about the current role of heavy silicone oils. Finally, the use of air as alternative and environment-friendly OE was judged not supported by sufficient evidence but worth of further investigation.The consensus panel developed recommendations aimed at promoting a more sustainable surgical practice.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!