Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ PubMed Centralarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
PubMed Central
Article . 2026
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: PubMed Central
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Risk Management in a Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory.

Authors: Ba, Afif; Machghoul, Mariem; Ayoub, Manel; Aboulkacem, Sana; Belhedi, Mariem; Aouni, Zied; Mazigh, Chakib;

Risk Management in a Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory.

Abstract

To ensure compliance with new laboratory standards, it is imperative to adopt risk-based thinking, which involves a systematic examination of the functions, procedures, and activities associated with risks and opportunities. This article aims to explore the implementation of risk-based thinking in medical biology laboratories and to highlight the challenges inherent in this approach.This descriptive study was conducted in the biochemistry laboratory of the Main Military Teaching Hospital of Tunis during the first half of 2024. A risk analysis was performed by a working group to identify failures by analyzing non-conformities recorded during the study period. The group adopted the Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) methodology, an inductive approach well-suited to process analysis and mastered by all participants. Subsequently, a corrective action plan was developed for each process phase.Across the entire laboratory workflow, 33 distinct failure modes were identified and cataloged for each step, followed by a criticality analysis. The distribution of these failures was 36.36% in the pre-analytical phase, 33.34% in the analytical phase, and 30.3% in the post-analytical phase. A review of the severity of their effects revealed that a significant portion constituted major risks.In response to the major risks identified at each stage of the laboratory workflow, a corrective action plan has been proposed. This plan outlines specific actions designed to reduce the criticality of these risks and enhance patient safety and quality of service.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Research Article

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green