
In a rabbit study a new material for conjunctival reconstruction was compared to lyophilized, amniotic membranes, which have been used for a long time. Standardized conjunctival defects were covered with thin, heterologous, glutaraldehyde-treated pericardium in one group, while in the other group lyophilized amnion grafts were used. In addition, conventional running suture fixation of the patches was compared to a fibrin sealing technique. The macroscopic findings during the follow-up period and the histological results are reported.
Bioprosthesis, Animals, Amnion, Rabbits, Conjunctiva, Pericardium
Bioprosthesis, Animals, Amnion, Rabbits, Conjunctiva, Pericardium
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
