Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Immunomodulatory effects of poly(I,C)-LC in cancer patients.

Authors: A E, Maluish; J W, Reid; E A, Crisp; W R, Overton; H, Levy; K A, Foon; R B, Herberman;

Immunomodulatory effects of poly(I,C)-LC in cancer patients.

Abstract

Poly(I,C)-LC was administered in low (1 mg/m2) and intermediate (4 mg/m2) doses to cancer patients by intramuscular injection or intravenous infusion to evaluate the immunomodulatory effects. Natural killer cell (NK) activity was elevated slightly at the low dose and remained unchanged overall, but some depression was observed at the 4 mg/m2 intravenous dose. Monocyte function was elevated in all groups of patients, as was the interferon-induced enzyme 2'5'-oligo-A synthetase. These increases were observed at the 1 mg/m2 intramuscular dose, despite a lack of detectable circulating serum interferon (IFN). In regard to cell surface markers, poly(I,C)-LC induced an increase in OKT10-positive cells and a small but consistent trend toward increases in the ratio of Leu-3/Leu-2-positive cells. Lymphocyte proliferation in response to concanavalin A was depressed by poly(I,C)-LC administration. Although an optimum immunomodulatory dose and schedule was not determined, the data indicate that low doses produce significant changes in immune function and that induction of detectable levels of circulating interferon is not required for poly(I,C)-LC to have biological effects.

Keywords

In Vitro Techniques, Methylcellulose, Lymphocyte Activation, Monocytes, Killer Cells, Natural, Poly I-C, Adjuvants, Immunologic, Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium, Neoplasms, 2',5'-Oligoadenylate Synthetase, Leukocytes, Drug Evaluation, Humans, Polylysine

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    18
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
18
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!