Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

The Detection of Δ9-THC, Δ8-THC, Δ10-THC and CBD in Hair Specimens.

Authors: Amy, Racines; Joseph, Jones; Katie, Lea; Donna, Coy;

The Detection of Δ9-THC, Δ8-THC, Δ10-THC and CBD in Hair Specimens.

Abstract

Cannabinoid use and misuse has been rising since 2011, and the development of new cannabinoid derivatives, partially due to the passage of the Farm Bill in 2018, and more relaxed legislation, has complicated testing for this drug class. The impact on child welfare in homes with cannabis substance use remains a concern, so detection of environmental exposure to cannabinoids is hugely beneficial. This article reports a validated confirmation method which detects delta 9-tetrahydrocannbinol (Δ9-THC), delta 8-tetrahydrocannbinol (Δ8-THC), delta 10-tetrahydrocannbinol (Δ10-THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) in environmentally exposed hair specimens via liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) following a supported liquid extraction. From February 2024-October 2024, 30.5% (n = 1787) of specimens tested positive for at least one analyte. The most common analyte was Δ9-THC (26.8%, n = 1574), followed by Δ8-THC (9.0%, n = 528), CBD (6.1%, n = 359) and Δ10-THC (0.4%, n = 24). While most of the specimens contained multiple analytes, it was found that 21.4% of the positive specimens had a single analyte exposure: 1062 specimens only confirmed for Δ9-THC, 165 specimens only confirmed for Δ8-THC, and 28 specimens only confirmed CBD. The addition of Δ8-THC, Δ10-THC, and CBD to the cannabinoids assay improved the detection of cannabinoids related cases, increasing our total positivity rate by an additional 3.6% (n = 213). The detection of all these analytes is crucial for reliable and accurate detection of cannabinoid environmental exposure.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!