Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Mikrobiyoloji Bulten...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

[Are Ureaplasma Species Being Disregarded in Urinary Tract Infections?]

Authors: Rukiye, Berkem; Tuğçe, Özyol Atkaya;

[Are Ureaplasma Species Being Disregarded in Urinary Tract Infections?]

Abstract

Ureaplasma parvum and Ureaplasma urealyticum can colonize the urinary and genital tracts and cause various infections. Due to their fastidious growth requirements, these organisms cannot be identified by routine laboratory diagnostic methods. Therefore, more detailed studies are needed to investigate their incidence in the community, resistance characteristics, and clinical manifestations. This study aimed to demonstrate the presence of ureaplasmas in patients with suspected urinary tract infections. As a part of the study objectives, a commercial real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRt-PCR) panel kit targeting U.urealyticum and U.parvum was used and the results were confirmed by sequence analysis. A total of 603 midstream urine samples submitted to our laboratory from patients with suspected urinary tract infections were analyzed using a urinary tract infection qRt-PCR panel kit (Bioeksen, Türkiye). Of the 195 samples found positive for U.urealyticum and/or U.parvum, 130 with sufficient sample volume were subjected to next generation sequencing (NGS) using the MinION™ system with a rapid barcoding kit (SQK-RBK110.96), both from Oxford Nanopore Technologies® (UK), according to the manufacturer’s instructions after storage at -20 °C. Of the 195 (32.33%) samples found positive by qRt-PCR, 138 (70.76%) were positive for U.parvum, 46 (23.58%) for U.urealyticum and 11 (5.64%) showed the presence of both species. Sequence analysis was performed on 130 of the 195 qPCR-positive samples that had sufficient volume. In 17 of these samples, no amplification product was observed during electrophoresis and five yielded insufficient sequencing data (< 10 coverage). As a result, sequence analysis data could not be obtained for 22 samples, while valid results were obtained for 108 samples. Among these 108 samples, 102 (94.44%) showed concordant results between qPCR and NGS, while six (5.56%) showed discordant results. One of the six discordant samples was identified as U.urealyticum by qPCR, while it was identified as U.parvum in the sequence analysis. In the remaining five samples, only one of the two species detected by qPCR could be demonstrated by NGS, the other could not be demonstrated. In three of the five samples, only U.parvum could be demonstrated by sequence analysis and in two, only U.urealyticum could be demonstrated. In the study, U.parvum and/or U.urealyticum positivity was found at a rate of 32.33% in midstream urine samples. In this study, it was aimed to draw attention to the fact that these microorganisms may be a possible cause of urinary tract infections due to their high positivity rates and they should not be ignored in clinical evaluations.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Adult, Ureaplasma Infections, Urinary Tract Infections, Humans, Female, Middle Aged, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction, Ureaplasma, Ureaplasma urealyticum

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold