Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Restricted effector cell function in ADCC.

Authors: P R, McConnachie; F, Lower; J A, McIntyre;

Restricted effector cell function in ADCC.

Abstract

Human effector cell function in ADCC reactions was studied as a result of observations showing discrepant ADCC reactivities among different effector cell populations. Effector cells prepared from ten blood donors were tested individually and as a pool against a battery of nine antisera-target cell combinations in an 11-x-9 matrix. The results identified individuals with weak, intermediate, and strong effector cell functions; however, there was a wide range of ADCC reactivity by each person's effector cells against the nine targets. No single antibody-target cell combination was consistently subjected to the least kill or greatest kill by the different effector cell preparations. Pooled effector cell responses were found to be weaker than expected. There was no relationship of age or sex with effector cell function, but a trend was noted for strong and weak reactions to be associated with HLA-DR7 and DR1, respectively. Neither the sharing of HLA antigens between effector and target cells nor self ADCC reactivity could account for the variations in effector cell function. Exploratory principal components factor analysis suggested that recognition of antibody-target cell combinations by effector cells was represented by three major groupings. These data collectively indicate the existence of an allorestrictive Fc receptor recognition step in ADCC responses.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Sex Factors, HLA Antigens, Age Factors, Antibody-Dependent Cell Cytotoxicity, Humans, Female, Lymphocytes, Receptors, Fc

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!