Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Archivio istituziona...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Comparison of Horizontal Jaw Relation Pathways of Edentulous Patients Recorded with a Digital Jaw Motion Tracking Device.

Authors: Ciocca L.; Maltauro M.; Tozzi F.; Vargiu E.; Meneghello R.; Montanari A.; Anderlucci L.;

Comparison of Horizontal Jaw Relation Pathways of Edentulous Patients Recorded with a Digital Jaw Motion Tracking Device.

Abstract

This clinical study compares condyle path elements (CPE) in edentulous patients using fully adjustable (FA) and semi-adjustable (MS) digital articulators.Ten patients with at least one edentulous jaw were included. Jaw relation records were digitally set in the articulators using two approaches: the MS group employed standard mean occlusal parameter values, while the FA group used individual values obtained using a digital jaw motion tracking device. Differences in CPEs, represented as Δ-values, were statistically analyzed using the non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test and post-hoc Tukey tepPst. These analyses evaluated overall differences between FA and MS articulators, identified the regions with the greatest Δ-errors, and determined the percentage of movement required for statistical significance.CPEs differed significantly between semi- and fully adjustable articulators. Significant variations were observed in individual CPEs (P < .001), with motion percentage significantly influencing Δ-values ( P< .001). Notably, within the first 20% of CPEs MS pathways, significant differences were within the initial 2 mm of movement, a critical range for prosthetic rehabilitation.This study highlights statistically significant differences in CPEs between semiand fully adjustable digital articulators, particularly within the initial 2 mm of movement. These findings underscore the importance of precise CPEs replication for occlusal design of complete dentures.

Keywords

CAD-CAM

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!