Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Rib Fixation in Severe Isolated Chest Trauma with Pulmonary Contusion: Rib fixation in pulmonary contusion.

Authors: Emanuele, Lagazzi; Vahe S, Panossian; Dias, Argandykov; Amory, de Roulet; Ikemsinachi C, Nzenwa; Wardah, Rafaqat; Casey, Luckhurst; +5 Authors

Rib Fixation in Severe Isolated Chest Trauma with Pulmonary Contusion: Rib fixation in pulmonary contusion.

Abstract

Pulmonary contusion (PC) is considered a relative contraindication to surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF). This study compared outcomes in patients undergoing SSRF vs. non-operative management (NOM).ACS-TQIP 2017-2020 was queried to identify patients with PC and severe chest wall injuries admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Outcomes included mortality, length of stay (LOS), and in-hospital complications. Subgroup analyses stratifying patients according to PC severity and institutional SSRF volume were performed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders.A total of 17,344 were included; 1789 (10.3 %) underwent SSRF, and 15,555 (89.7 %) did not. SSRF was associated with lower mortality (OR: 0.47, 95 % CI: 0.33-0.68, p < 0.001) but increased ventilator-associated pneumonia, tracheostomy, unplanned ICU admissions, and intubations. It was also associated with increased hospital LOS by 3.46 days (95 % CI: 2.94-3.98) and ICU LOS by 2.33 days (95 % CI: 1.99-2.68). Institutional volume above the median level of 7 SSRF cases was associated with reduced ventilator days by 1.3 days (95 % CI:2.54 to -0.05), hospital LOS by 1.7 days (95 % CI:2.58 to -0.82), and ICU LOS by 1.4 days (95 % CI:2.11 to -0.64), with no significant effects on other outcomes.In patients with severe chest wall injury and PC, SSRF is associated with lower mortality at the expense of longer LOS.

Keywords

Male, Adult, Rib Fractures, Thoracic Injuries, Contusions, Lung Injury, Length of Stay, Middle Aged, Intensive Care Units, Injury Severity Score, Treatment Outcome, Humans, Female, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!