Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Relapse in psychotic depression and comparison with non-psychotic depression].

Authors: L, Cools; O, Jennen; S, Lambrichts; K, Vansteelandt; P, Sienaert;

[Relapse in psychotic depression and comparison with non-psychotic depression].

Abstract

Psychotic depression (PD) is a severe disease with a lifetime prevalence between 0.35 and 1%. The guidelines recommend combination therapy with an antidepressant and an antipsychotic, whereas in non-psychotic depression (NPD) an antidepressant is advised as monotherapy.To determine whether there is a difference in relapse rates between PD and NPD, and which treatment is associated with the lowest relapse rate.A systematic literature search across 6 databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL) and a meta-analysis were conducted to compare relapse rates between PD and NPD.Eight studies with a total of 468 patients and 147 relapse events were included in the meta-analysis. No statistically significant difference could be demonstrated in relapse rates between PD and NPD. The difference in relapse rates in PD between various treatments was not statistically analyzed, but qualitatively described. There was a wide variation in treatment methods and a broad range of relapse rates.Based on our findings, there is no statistically significant difference in relapse rates between patients with PD and NPD. However, caution is warranted with this conclusion, as the meta-analysis is based on a limited number of studies with high variability in the outcome measure. It seems important to continue acute treatment after response or remission, but which treatment modality best prevents relapse remains unclear.

Keywords

Treatment Outcome, Psychotic Disorders, Depression, Recurrence, Humans, Antidepressive Agents, Antipsychotic Agents

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!