Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Initial results with the AO Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS)].

Authors: A, Osterwalder; C, Dietschi; S, Martinoli;

[Initial results with the AO Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS)].

Abstract

The report is based on a follow-up of over 54 osteosyntheses employing the Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) of the AO on the proximal femur. The patients, of an average age of 72 years, exhibited the following lesions: fractures of 7 femoral necks, 43 fractures in the pertrochanteric region, 3 reverse fractures and 1 subtrochanteric metastasis. An unstable fracture was present on 26 occasions. The follow-up, carried out personally, was done from 3 to 26 months postoperatively on 38 out of 40 patients still alive. The average age was 68 years. In not a single case was an implant failure or a protrusion of the screw into the joint observed. Technical faults were present in 4 cases (7.4%) that led in 1 case to an infection (1.85%). 37 patients (97%), of which 23 were between 70 and 90 years of age, were able to walk during the follow-up. 34 (89%) of the patients showed symmetrical, or less than 20 degrees of limited hip movement while 12 (32%) sporadically complained of slight pain or weather dependency. 2 of the 7 patients with femoral neck fractures and 4 of the remaining 47 patients with trochanteric fractures (including 1 subtrochanteric metastasis) had to be reoperated. The DHS proved to be a simple and efficient fixation device for proximal femoral fractures in the hands of ten different surgeons. The telescopic sliding of the screw enables a compulsory sintering of the fracture, without leading to penetration of the femoral head or breakage of the implant.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Hip Fractures, Bone Screws, Middle Aged, Prosthesis Design, Femoral Neck Fractures, Radiography, Postoperative Complications, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Humans, Female, Bone Plates, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    8
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
8
Average
Top 10%
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!