Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Corneal diameter and axial length in congenital glaucoma.

Authors: A A, Kiskis; S N, Markowitz; J D, Morin;

Corneal diameter and axial length in congenital glaucoma.

Abstract

The corneal diameter was recorded and the ocular axial length measured by A-scan ultrasonography in 31 eyes of 17 children (ages 0.05 to 7.0 years) who had undergone or were about to undergo surgery for primary congenital glaucoma. These measurements were also done in 60 normal eyes of 33 children (ages 0.20 to 9.6 years) undergoing nonophthalmic surgery. Both measures were usually greater than normal in the glaucomatous eyes. However, the corneal diameter was more sensitive than the axial length in identifying congenital glaucoma. The axial length measurement did not provide additional useful information for any of the eyes. We conclude that the corneal diameter is a more reliable guide than the axial length in the assessment of congenital glaucoma. A transparent plastic gauge for rapid and accurate measurement of the corneal diameter is described.

Keywords

Cornea, Anthropometry, Child, Preschool, Humans, Infant, Glaucoma, Ultrasonics, Child

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    41
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
41
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!