Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Experimental and Cli...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
addClaim

Effect of Transplanted Liver Fat Percentage on Organ Survival: A Retrospective Review.

Authors: Sakineh, Amoueian; Mohsen, Aliakbarian; Golnaz, Ghayyem Hassankhani; Mohammad, Bahadoripour; Behnoush, Bahadoripour;

Effect of Transplanted Liver Fat Percentage on Organ Survival: A Retrospective Review.

Abstract

Liver transplant is the most effective therapeutic option for patients with end-stage liver disease, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, and acute liver failure. We evaluated whether the percentage of hepatic fat percentage affected transplant outcomes to determine whether livers with varying severity of macrosteatosis should be considered suitable for donation.We analyzed data from 381 patients with liver failure who received liver transplant at Montaseriyeh Hospital in Mashhad, Iran, between 2013 and 2022. Clinical and demographical data were collected, and we examined frozen-section slides of pretransplant biopsy specimens from donor livers. Liver allograft macrosteatosis was categorized into 4 groups according to severity of steatosis: 30%.The mean age of recipients was 49 years; mean age of donors was 37 years. The mean liver survival rate was approximately 56 months. A total of 115 recipients (30%) died after liver transplant, with graft rejection as the leading cause of death (38%). Grafts with hepatic macrosteatosis <10% contributed to the largest share (87%). No significant differences were observed in the indication for liver transplant, life outcome, cause of death after liver transplant, or mean rate of liver survival among the 4 groups. Also, there was no significant correlation between the severity of liver macrosteatosis and graft or patient survival.Our findings suggest that livers with varying degrees of macrosteatosis are safe for transplant and should not be excluded from the donor pool.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Adult, Time Factors, Graft Survival, Middle Aged, Iran, Severity of Illness Index, Risk Assessment, Tissue Donors, Liver Transplantation, Donor Selection, End Stage Liver Disease, Young Adult, Treatment Outcome, Liver, Risk Factors, Humans, Female, Retrospective Studies, Adiposity

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
gold