
The effectiveness and safety of pirenzepine (PRZ) at 150 mg daily in the treatment of active duodenal ulcer was studied in an open pilot clinical trial followed by a double-blind trial against placebo. The open pilot study showed that pirenzepine was well tolerated and promoted ulcer healing in the 45% of patients within 2 weeks of treatment and in 90% within 4 weeks. The double-blind trial against placebo (PL) Confirmed these results: 60% of the patients in PRZ group and 10% of the patients in PL group showed endoscopic ulcer healing after 2 weeks. This difference was significant. Ninety per cent of the PRZ patients and 50% of the PL patients were completely healed after 4 weeks. In the PRZ group, gastric secretory tests showed a significant decrease in B.A.O. (69%), M.A.O. (33%) and P.A.O. (34%) after 2 weeks. In the PL group, the same parameters had only a small decrease, without statistical significance. There were no pathological changes in laboratory findings in either the open or the double-blind studies. Mild and transient side-effects were observed in 7 of 30 patinets receiving pirenzepine (diplopia and dryness of the mouth).
Adult, Male, Benzodiazepinones, Clinical Trials as Topic, Gastric Juice, Pirenzepine, Middle Aged, Anti-Ulcer Agents, Piperazines, Placebos, Random Allocation, Double-Blind Method, Duodenal Ulcer, Humans, Female
Adult, Male, Benzodiazepinones, Clinical Trials as Topic, Gastric Juice, Pirenzepine, Middle Aged, Anti-Ulcer Agents, Piperazines, Placebos, Random Allocation, Double-Blind Method, Duodenal Ulcer, Humans, Female
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
