Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Molecular pathology of gastrointestinal neoplasms].

Authors: Tamás, Strausz; László, Báthory-Fülöp; Eszter, Papp; Erika, Tóth;

[Molecular pathology of gastrointestinal neoplasms].

Abstract

The molecular pathological examination of solid tumors is essential not only for supporting histological diagnosis but also for detecting hereditary variations and predictive biomarkers. Analyzing predictive markers is fundamental to personalized cancer therapy, directly affecting patient care through pathological testing. These analyses employ both traditional immunohistochemical staining methods and molecular genetic techniques. In both approaches, preanalytics is of critical importance, necessitating the adoption of standardized and reproducible processes. Molecular diagnostics in colorectal cancer focuses on detecting activating mutations in the MAPK pathway (KRAS, NRAS, BRAF), as well as evaluating microsatellite instability and HER2 amplification. Immunohistochemical methods can effectively identify biomarkers for gastric cancers, including the novel claudin18.2. The responsiveness of gastrointestinal stromal tumors to imatinib requires validation via molecular testing. Patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer may see enhanced survival rates by targeted therapy addressing microsatellite instability and BRCA mutations. In bile duct malignancies, especially intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma of the small duct variant, the analysis of IDH1 mutations and FGFR2 fusions presents new treatment prospects.

Keywords

Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf, Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors, Receptor, ErbB-2, Membrane Proteins, Immunohistochemistry, Isocitrate Dehydrogenase, GTP Phosphohydrolases, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), Pancreatic Neoplasms, Stomach Neoplasms, Mutation, Biomarkers, Tumor, Imatinib Mesylate, ras Proteins, Humans, Microsatellite Instability, Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2, Pathology, Molecular, Colorectal Neoplasms, Gastrointestinal Neoplasms

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!